Now Playing
AI Regulation Splintered: Four Jurisdictions, Zero Convergence
Audio is available on Spreaker — see link below.
Global AI regulation has fractured into four incompatible compliance regimes — and there's no convergence in sight. This episode breaks down what the EU AI Act delays, U.S. state patchwork, China's model export controls, and South Korea's new law mean for builders, plus why OpenAI just trimmed its fundraising target.
Audio is available on Spreaker — see link below.
The dream of a single global AI standard is over. That's not speculation.
Meanwhile, the United States still has no federal AI law. What it does have is all fifty states introducing AI legislation in twenty twenty-five, with thirty-eight of them enacting roughly one hundred measures.
The more strategically significant move this week came from Beijing. China announced outbound export controls covering twenty-three AI items, including large models, autonomous agents, and computing clusters.
Two more data points that frame the split. South Korea's AI Basic Act took effect on January twenty-second, twenty twenty-six.
None of this is happening in a financial vacuum. OpenAI cut its fundraising target from thirty billion dollars to twenty billion dollars this week, with its valuation trimmed from one point four trillion to one point two five trillion.
The through-line connecting all of this is cost. Compliance to the strictest regime, which means the EU, is now the baseline strategy for any company operating globally.
Chapter summary auto-generated from the verified script. Listen to the full episode for the complete content.