Now Playing
Marcella Claxton: The Witness Who Could Have Stopped Sutcliffe
Audio is available on Spreaker — see link below.
Peter Sutcliffe attacked Marcella Claxton in 1976 and she gave police a detailed description — but West Yorkshire Police dismissed her. This chapter examines how investigative bias and the Wearside Jack hoax let a killer walk free nine times over.
Audio is available on Spreaker — see link below.
If the West Yorkshire Police had taken Marcella Claxton seriously, Peter Sutcliffe might have been stopped in nineteen seventy-six. That's not speculation.
May of nineteen seventy-six. Chapeltown, Leeds.
To understand why Claxton was sidelined, you need to understand how the West Yorkshire Police were thinking about this case from very early on. The first confirmed murder was Wilma McCann in October nineteen seventy-five.
The Yorkshire Ripper inquiry was, in raw terms, enormous. Two and a half million police hours went into the manhunt.
By nineteen seventy-nine the inquiry was already struggling under its own weight. Then it got worse.
January second, nineteen eighty-one. Sheffield.
The trial opened at the Old Bailey in May nineteen eighty-one. Sutcliffe had confessed to thirteen murders and seven attempted murders.
The arrest didn't end the reckoning. What followed was an official inquiry into how the police had failed so comprehensively for so long.
The question this episode keeps returning to is the one the case has always carried. When does an investigation start to fail?
Chapter summary auto-generated from the verified script. Listen to the full episode for the complete content.